FA Links List update

The following blogs have been added:

The following weird bits have been fixed:

  • No More Mumus - was on the FA links page, but not on the feed. Whoops.
  • suethsayings - was on the FA links page, but not on the feed. (Yikes. I may need to do an audit on this, if i find anymore. Gnah.)

The following blogs have been removed:

  • None! Yay! :D

To-do list (to be done at some point in the near future - not today):

  • compare search engine sites & feed & list; make sure they all match.
  • noticed that tags and categories act like they’re the same thing; not sure if that’s a fault of the theme or the way it’s set up on WP. may have to find a new theme; shame, too, because there are only 6 decent 3 column themes on WP. bleah.
  • check for more mutual linky goodness bits.

Outcast? Outsider? Or just weird? Or none of the above?

Outcast: One that has been excluded from a society or system, a pariah.

Outsider: (idiomatic) Someone who is excluded from a community.

I do not think of myself as an FA outcast. Whether or not i am an FA “outsider” might be debatable, depending who you ask. I have never on my own blog called myself an outcast, and only once used the term “outsider”; the date on that post was in January, and while i don’t think SAD is an excuse for the more negative bits that come out of my mouth, i do think it is a valid explanation. We all say stupid crap that we later regret. I’m no different in that regard.

I have frequently called myself weird, or a weirdo. It’s kind of funny: i’ve been called that all my life, and at some point decided to take it as a compliment. Somewhere along the way, i forgot that it was usually intended to be an insult… even though the other kids at school were just as likely to mock me with “you’re a weirdo” as they were to call me a fatso.

Regardless of stupid schoolkid antics, when i call myself weird, i’m not trying to be self-insultory, self-depricating, or self-isolating. I’m being honest:

  • I believe in faeries - not figuratively, but literally. I believe i have a horde of pixies who derive pleasure from messing with my electronics. I suspect they are also responsible for the items which disappear and then reappear in the oddest places.
  • I live in a haunted house, and it does not bother me to hear voices in the hallway when i’m home alone. (No, they’re not in my head - the house has a well documented history.)
  • I have multiple piercings and tattoos. The holes in my ears are up to a 0g, and the only reason i haven’t sized them up is because i have so much jewelry in this size. If i had my druthers, i’d have 1-inch holes in my earlobes, full sleeve tattoos, and a LOT more piercings (my record was ten, but now i only have six).
  • I like to eat popcorn with grape jelly. This alone tends to freak people out. It’s a sweet/salty thing that just totally works for me.
  • I can’t be arsed to pay attention to fashion. I can, have, and will leave the house in things most folks wouldn’t be caught dead in (i see no reason that leopard print shouldn’t be worn with plaid). If it’s comfortable and doesn’t smell or have obvious dirt on it, i don’t care what it looks like or if it matches. Ask me about my breezy college jeans sometime.
  • I talk to myself quite frequently. I have been known to sing and dance when alone in elevators. I have been known to not stop singing or dancing when no longer alone in elevators. I also will start laughing out loud for no obvious reason anyone can fathom (usually it’s because i’ve remembered or thought of something funny).

All of these things (and more) have given people reason to label me as Weird. (If you don’t think these things are “weird”? Then i want to hang out with you. Seriously. I would love to hang out with more people who share my “what’s normal for me” bits.) I see nothing wrong with any of the above, so why should i object to someone calling my spade a spade? In a society where conformity is the norm, i can see why weirdism (is that a word?) would be frowned upon and thought of as negative. Perhaps thinking “weird does not automatically mean bad” is also a bit weird.

I get the impression that sometimes people associate weirdness with people doing unmentionable nonconsensuals in out of the way locations. Or like, serial killers. We always knew he was a bit weird, but we never imagined… Fuuuuuuuuuuck that. I’m taking the weird back. Just like the word fat. Fat is a descriptor of the shape of my body, and weird is a descriptor of the shape of my brain.

Ben and i were talking about this sort of thing the other night. I forget how it came up. We were talking about the role of the outcast as presented in modern culture. It’s the wise wanderer who breezes through town and is able to tell the locals the things they could never hear from themselves, or from each other. His (or her) role is to show up, provide an outsider’s viewpoint, and then leave. He is not allowed to stay, lest he take on that same common viewpoint; he doesn’t have a place there, he doesn’t fit in.

Why do people go to psychics, palm readers or tarot card readers? We want someone who doesn’t know us to tell us more about us. Say that five times fast. We can’t ever see ourselves as others see us. We can’t trust those we know to get an unbiased viewpoint: the people that don’t like us are going to attribute more negative things to our words and actions, whereas the people who do like us are going to see those same things in a more positive light.

I’m not saying i have any special insight into FA or the fatosphere, or that my viewpoint is any more or less valid than anyone else’s. All i’m saying is that it’s different. I imagine that should be a given, seeing as how we’re all different people and have different opinions about different things. We need (and should want) to be a diverse community, with different experiences and viewpoints to bring to the table, enabling us to further reach different types of people and communities.

We can only see so much in a mirror. If we look closely enough, we can see each individual pore, scar, mole, freckle and follicle. But how often do we really look at those things on other people? Why do we think that people will so readily seek out or notice our faults, when we’re too busy (usually looking at our own faulty bits) to notice their faults?

Why am i bringing this up? Well, The Rotund has brought it to my attention that i have, on several occasions, made it difficult for people to interact with me by my insistence that i am an outcast. As previously stated, we can never truly know how other people see us; therefore, i’ve no way of knowing how common TR’s interpretation is. If i’ve been giving people what i think is a wrong impression of myself, then it’s obviously something i need to address with my affectations and interactions. Or it’s something i need to explore: how and why am i broadcasting this? What baggage might it be tied to?

And so, having begun to question and look at some of the bits about me that i imagine might be off-putting, i would humbly request your assistance with this matter. Have i missed something? Is there anything you’d like me to clear up? Anything you’ve heard about me that you’d like me to clear up? Anything i’ve said that’s offended you, would you like to work it out? Just to make things interesting, i’m going to see if i can set this post to allow anonymous comments.

It’s funny: i don’t care much what most people think about me, which i think is a big part of why people think i’m weird. But i’m posting this because i do care what you think about me. And somehow, that strikes me as weird. Now i’m stopping, because my brains hurt.

ETA: I’ve enabled anonymous commenting, so you are welcome to comment anonymously if you feel so inclined. If you’re concerned about the IP address thing, you can use a site like anonymouse or something (i forget the exact addy, but you can google it). I will be turning anonymous commenting off in a few days, so this is not a permanent change.

Fluffybits: where have i been?

It’s only been a week since i last posted, but it feels like longer. It’s been a busy week. Good, but busy. I’ve been working on a project for this blog, but haven’t yet decided where i’m going to go with it, or how far i’m going to take it. Since there’s so much unknown, i’m being all hushface about it until i figure more stuff out. But i will say that i’ve got the first step down, now i just have to refine, revise and poke it with sticks until i figure out what shape it’s going to take.

Other than that? WoW: Wrath of the Lich King came out on Thursday. I took Friday off because i just plain needed a three day weekend. And for those of you in the know: i left my Ret Pally at level 56 so that i could level her along with Ben’s new Death Knight. I went from 56 to 69 in three days. Thirteen levels. Woo boy. Part of that is that Ben and i just work/game really well together. That’s one of the joys of marrying a gamer. But now that we’re in Northrend, we’re going to slow the pace down and enjoy the ride. Ben’s already familiar with what’s what in that part of the world, because when i got a beta key a few months ago, i gave it to him so he could poke around with Death Knight bits (yes, i totally won Wife of the Year award for that).

Oh, and my evening primrose oil arrived a few days ago, and i can totally feel the difference. I’d forgotten just how much a difference it really does make. A few days ago i found myself getting rather upset about a post i’d seen in the fatosphere. I decided against commenting on it publicly because i knew i was a bit emotionally skewed. Now that a bit of time has passed, and a bit of sanity restored, i’m able to shrug it off more easily.

Oooh, another thing that arrived in the mail: Bottle O’Comfybits, aka “Spring Green Vitabath”. It was the stuff my grandma used for my bubble baths whenever i was staying over at her house. I got some shower gel and some lotion. So i can huff inhale the scent, and suddenly i’m back with her, safe and happy and loved like whoa. It’s amazing how smells can so easily bring back memories, both good and bad. I’ve been thinking a lot about this lately, as someone who regularly takes the same commute as i do wears a cologne that i associate with far less pleasant memories. But this bath stuff? Made of pure win. On one hand, the uniqueness of it makes it that much more special. On the other hand? It’s hella expensive (almost $100 for a gallon jug of it, ouch); why couldn’t she have used Mr Bubble or something? But that’s okay. I’ll make this stuff last as long as i can, and then get more like, once a year or something. A special treat, maybe around the beginning of winter, when the days start to get oppressively long. Yay for happysmells.

Heating and eating tips for a cold winter and crappy economy

(I’m pretty sure i’ve posted something similar before, but i figure it’s worth a repost.)

Just about everyone i know is having financial trouble as of late. This winter looks to be a cold one, and i know a lot of people with gas-powered heat in their homes. I figured now’s as good a time as any to post some of the tricks i’ve learned living in a very drafty house. I’ll also post some eating-cheaply tips, because yanno, being able to eat is good times.

To help keep yourself warm

For about $30 at Lowes or Home Depot, you can get an oil-filled radiator. They’re good for about one decent-sized room, maybe two. We’ve got two - one in the bedroom, one in the computer room. We’ve put up “curtains” (really, just extra twin-size blankets or thick fabrics we had lying around) over the doorways to keep the warmth in those rooms.

If you don’t have extra fabric or blankets you feel comfortable tacking up in doorways, you can pick up some of those polar fleece lap-blankets relatively cheaply. Around here, we can usually get them for $5 each. No, those won’t cover the entire doorway from top to bottom, but you don’t need to worry too much about the lower foot or so of the doorway - heat rises, and you won’t lose too much heat that way.

Yes, you can get a heater-fan for $10, but honestly i don’t trust those things. I wouldn’t be able to sleep properly if i left one on overnight - too much of a fire hazard. Those also tend to have a fairly high energy usage. The oil radiators generally have energy-saving settings. The ones we have come with two power switches: turn them both on when you’re first starting it up (and the clicking noises you hear are normal - it’s the sound of metal expanding as it warms), and once it’s going, turn off one of the switches. Even if you were to turn both off, the radiator will continue to give off some heat for an hour or so.

Also: if you’ve got drafty windows, go pick up as big a roll as you can find of plastic dropcloth - you’ll find it in the paint sections at Target, Walmart, Lowes or Home Depot. Cut sections to cover the window frames; use double-sided tape to put between the plastic and the window frame, and then use masking tape over the outside edges to the plastic to help it stay up better and give extra protection against drafts.

The two heaters were $60 total, and i spent about $30 on the tapes and plastic. For less than $100 investment and some elbow grease, this approach saved us about $75-$100 a month last winter (we’ve got gas heating). We haven’t even turned the house heat on yet this year - and the temperature has already dropped to the mid-30s several nights.

How to eat cheaply

This one is more difficult, because people’s tastes and diets (in what they can and cannot eat) vary greatly. And here’s where i give a great big caveat: if you have any sort of dietary oddities, consult with a doctor or nurse before doing this. I have no idea how well this diet plan would work for a diabetic, or someone with hypoglycemia. If you cannot eat any of the things listed here, then find safe alternatives or ignore this altogether and come up with your own plan. The idea here is to save money, not make yourself ill.

Several years ago, i was living by myself and making $900 a month; rent was $550 and i had a $225 car note. This is how i managed to feed myself for about $10-15 a week:

Things you’ll need (above and beyond basic kitchen bits: stove, fridge, etc):

  • crock pot
  • soup pan
  • cutting board
  • oven bags & casserole dish
  • decent cutting knives
  • plastic bags (zip lock if you can afford them - but once you get them, you can wash and re-use them)
  • tupperware for storing soup (those “disposable” plastic containers are handy for this, but i used to use old yogurt containers that had lids)

Go to the store and pick up:

  • one whole chicken, as big as will fit in your crock pot.
  • several bags of frozen veggies (whichever kinds you prefer)
  • ramen, rice, and/or quinoa
  • a carton of eggs
  • bouillon cubes (optional)
  • one whole lemon (optional)
  • if you have money left over, do yourself a favor and buy as much fresh fruit as you can

Prices will vary by location, naturally. Last time i did this, i was able to get all of the above for $15 or so - and i had splurged on a fair bit of fruit.

Go home, and prep the chicken: if you picked up a lemon, poke it a few times with a fork and stuff it inside the chicken. Salt and pepper the bird, put it in an oven bag, and cook as directed on the bag it came in. Make sure it’s fully cooked (the oven bag will make sure it doesn’t dry out, and you’ll use those extra juices later).

Once the chicken is fully cooked, let it cool enough to where you can safely carve it up without burning yourself. Carve it up into individual servings (try to get as many as you can), and put those servings into your plastic bags. Put the bags of chicken into the fridge (or freezer), and turn back to what remains of your chicken.

Take all of the chicken bones and dump them into the crock pot. Fill the oven bag with warm water and then pour the water from the bag into the crock pot. Do this into the crock pot is almost full. Cook on high until it’s come to a boil, then turn the heat on low and let it sit for at least half a day. Once it’s done, you should have a decent chicken broth. If it’s not strong enough for your liking, you can add a bouillon cube or two.

You’ll want to strain the broth so that you’re not eating the bones; granted, they will have gotten soft and possible even mushy after all that cooking. If you’ve got cheese cloth, you can use that. If not, metal strainers are a better option (maybe not cheaper, but easier to re-use). Let the broth cool, then put it into your tupperware and put it in the fridge.

A brief note on this: after the broth has chilled, you can just lift the fat/grease off of the top of it. However, i would not recommend doing this, no matter how much you may be tempted to do so. While everyone and their mother is trying to tell you how bad fat is for you, leaving it in will make you feel more satiated after you’ve eaten. You’re not doing this to lose weight, you’re doing this to not go hungry - and your body does need at least a little fat to get the most of what you’re putting into it.

Yes, that was all just a bunch of prep-work. Here’s how you make meals from it:

If you bought ramen, use the chicken broth instead of water. Toss the flavour packets out - they’re horrid for you. Bring it to a boil, add the ramen; once the noodles are soft, toss in a handful or three of your frozen veggies. Once it’s come back up to a boil, crack an egg into it. Let it boil another minute or so to cook the egg, and then serve.

If you bought rice or quinoa: cook the rice/quinoa with broth instead of water (still follow the directions on the package as to the grain to liquid ratio). Take some frozen veggies, toss them into one of the bags that has some of your chicken and close it up. If you have a microwave, you can cook them in there and they’ll steam quite nicely. If you don’t, you’ll want to have gotten ziplock bags that are safe to boil - you can just put the bag of veggies and chicken into a pan of water, heat up the water, and boil them in the bag. Once everything is cooked, serve the chicken and veggies on top of the rice/quinoa.

The fresh fruits that i hope you had extra money for, those make excellent snacks and desserts.

For breakfasts: make yourself some rice, and right when it’s done, crack an egg into it.

If you bring your lunch to work and don’t have kitchen access there, you can prepare the meals at home the night before, and then zap them in the microwave at work.

I wouldn’t recommend doing this for long periods of time, because 1) it does get a bit tedious after a while, and 2) if you’re going the ramen route, it’s not nutritionally ideal. But it will get you through a tight week or month fairly well.

If you want more variety and/or this does not work for you for health reasons, i know there are any number of blogs out there that deal with cost-effective cooking. Google is your friend - go find them. :)

Gluten-free, hormones and more chronic pain bits.

[Okay, this started out as a simple update on trying the gluten-free thing, and then somehow became a bit of emotional spleen-venting. You were warned. It ain't pretty.]

So far, so good.

Ordering GF quinoa-based pasta and some GF all-purpose flour from Amazon.com means i can still have pasta and the pancakes that Ben loves making for me in the mornings. My second breakfast* is usually popcorn. Lunch is salad (only difference here is the lack of croutons). Dinner is whatever Ben makes. One night this week, it was quinoa-pasta with homemade tomato sauce. Another night it was eggplant and potato curry.

[* - i wake up at 4:40am, and my stomach does not like the idea of food at that point. So i'll eat as much as my stomach will allow (usually like, half of a pancake) and Ben has the rest. A few hours later, when my stomach has had a chance to wake up, i'll have a snack of some kind. Some days, it used to be poptarts because they were cheap and available, other days it would be some grits or a sausage biscuit.]

This week at work there have been several rounds free Einstein Brothers bagels and Krispy Kreme donuts. I said no to all of them. Quite easily, too. I was saying no because i know that eating them might cause me harm - they both have profuse amounts of wheat. I’m not interested in doing that to myself. One rather nice (but uninformed as to why) chap, upon seeing me decline a donut, said, “Good for you.” I had to think about how i felt about that for a minute. (And on further reflection, i’m going to hide the rest behind a cut, because this is where it starts to get owie.)

Read the rest of this entry »

*Insert eyeball twitching here*

I’ve still been having a blast on LiveMocha. My studying has slowed down a bit, mostly because the first few lessons were things i’d already covered to some extent in my earlier studies. But i plan to make some serious headway this weekend, yay. Heh. It’s amazing how studying can be made fun and awesome with such nifty toys and tools and people.

So earlier today, i received a notification that one of my Russian friends wanted me to review one of his writing exercises. I’d had a really (and i mean really like whoa) bad day, so i didn’t get to look at it until a few minutes ago. The topic in question was “when was the last time you went to a café, and what did you order?” He wrote a bit about having gone to a McDonalds (he admitted to some confusion on whether or not it was a café). He did a really good job, and i wrote up my evaluation before i noticed that some other people had also commented.

This is where i get twitchy. One of the other commenters had said, “Why do you want to eat at McDonalds? Don’t you know that’s how Americans got so FAT?” He then proceeded with his review, adding commentary about what the guy had eaten and how bad it was for him, and then wrote up a whole separate paragraph about how bad fast food is for you, how many calories it has, and how he’ll “balloon up in no time”.

*facepalm*

Yanno, whether anyone thinks his statements are true or false is fucking irrelevant. What is said is NOT APPROPRIATE. LM is a site to learn and teach language, to help break communication barriers, to help people learn how to communicate with each other - NOT lecture people on what they eat. This isn’t YouTube, this isn’t Usenet, this is a language site. Where people study language.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

I’ve raved about this site on this blog, and it distresses me that this sort of vile crap has popped up there. I’m not the sort of person who gets upset about caloric content discussions, i’m sure i’ve got at least one or two readers who are sensitive to this sort of thing. It’s really shaken me up; i can’t imagine what it would be like for someone with serious food issues to run into that out of nowhere. I don’t want this incident to scare anyone off from it, either. This is one negative incident, i just needed to rant about it. (And yes - i downvoted his comment.)

Race and disability, analogies and differences

It’s no great secret that we understand new concepts best when they are put into terms and phrases that we’re already familiar with. It’s why i frequently use car analogies to explain to people what’s wrong with their computers. (Example: the minute you pull up to the mechanic’s garage, your car will stop making that terrifying noise; similarly, as soon i take a look at your computer, the error message will stop coming up. Pets, kids, cars and computers - sometimes they exist for the sole purpose of making you look like a great big liarpants.) Keeping that in mind, i’m going to talk about an issue that i am familiar with, in the hopes that it can help me get a better understanding of situations outside my realm of experience. (And i’m going to hope that it doesn’t make me look like a great big ass in the process.)

While i think this post is important as its own thing, it is also intended to be analogous to discussions of race and privilege as i have seen them in and around the fatosphere. I am not looking to earn points with anyone, i am not expecting anyone to give me a cookie for this. The feedback i’m hoping for is not smiley-faces and claps on the back, but rather: how accurate is the analogy at various parts? What parts of it are completely off base? Are there parts of it that are too assumptive? Are there parts of it that are too subtle? (I’m not saying i’m entitled to this kind of feedback, i’m just trying to be helpful.)

As many of you already know, i have a chronic pain condition called fibromyalgia. Let’s say that one day i’m crying on your shoulder about how much pain i’ve been in lately. Or maybe i’m talking to you about how much the pain has recently been upsetting me (because minor physical pain can cause major emotional distress). While you may have good intentions of trying to console me, sometimes the only way you can think to do so is to tell me about the headache you’ve got.

Now, i know intellectually that your headache does not invalidate my backache, but it still feels emotionally invalidating that you are trying to present it as a parallel experience. Most everyone has had at least one headache or stubbed toe or hangnail in their lifetime, but not everyone gets full-body aches like fibro can cause. I think you’re trying to tell me that you understand what i’m feeling, but it’s especially frustrating because i can’t seem to convey to you that you can’t understand. You cannot begin to comprehend just how much fibro affects every part of my daily life, because you don’t have fibromyalgia, nor do you have any similar chronic health condition.

I could come up with a list of 50 (or more) things that i think able-bodied people take for granted. No, they may not all apply to you specifically; hell, you personally may be “exempt” from half of the list. On one hand, i appreciate that because it might mean that you have some empathy for what i’m going through. On the other hand, it doesn’t make that list impact me any less: it still represents things that i do not have the option of taking for granted.

Your headache doesn’t make my body-ache go away. My body-ache doesn’t make your headache hurt you any less. Comparing our unequal pains might be an exercise in empathy, but sometimes it just highlights the differences between us. Your headache may keep you from going out dancing with your friends tonight, but fibro took that off my calendar years ago, and has no intention of putting it back on anytime soon - if ever.

Now, on the flip side of that coin…

Fibro is an invisible illness, which means that when you look at me, you can’t tell that i have it. Most of the time, i look like there’s nothing wrong wrong with me. (I say most of the time, because sometimes an ankle or a knee will just randomly start hurting when i walk, thus causing me to limp for maybe 5 minutes, maybe half the day.)

Is this an advantage or a disadvantage that i can “pass” as able-bodied? Truth is it’s a bit of both. It means that i get strange looks (and occasional glares) when i sit in one of the unoccupied handicapped seats on the bus, or when i use one of the handicapped stalls in a public restroom. It means that if i need to use one of the electric carts at the grocery store, people are going to make some nasty assumptions about me: since i’m fat, they’ll probably assume i’m just being lazy; if i were thin, they’d probably assume i was just being an asshat, or that i was making light of the ultimate purpose of the carts.

Someone who’s visibly disabled is more likely to get a seat on a crowded bus, but they’re also likely to have people talk to them as if they were a hard-of-hearing 5 year old (”DOOOO… YYOOOUUUU… LIIIKE… COOO-KEEEEZ????”), or worse, talking about them as if they’re not even there. Someone in a wheelchair is more likely to hear people talk about how brave they are, and how special they are. Nothing dehumanizes a person quite like being turned into an after-school special: “i am not a person, i am a warning; i am a lesson for you to learn. I exist to remind you of a handful of platitudes that will make you grateful that you’re not me. Once you have heard the lesson you expect me to deliver, you can change the channel and catch up on Seinfeld re-runs. Gee, thanks.” When was the last time you saw a movie starring a handicapped main character for which their disability was not the central point of the plot?

I am disabled and yet not. I am prevented from doing a lot of things that most able-bodied people take for granted, but at the same time i do not have it as badly as someone who is less able-bodied than myself. I am able to understand only some of what they go through on a daily basis - but definitely not all of it.

Why am i writing this now? Several reasons, actually. I hope some of the more general reasons should be obvious, but i want to touch briefly on some specific reasons. On top of all that, these are important issues that are worthy of discussion.

Earlier today i was talking with a friend about politics and the election; during this discussion, the subject of race came up. She lives in a very small town in the south, and has very limited exposure and experience with issues of race. I tried to explain to her the concepts behind privilege, knowing that i myself can only go so far in explaining what i have not personally experienced, and knowing that i myself have not always understood the concept of privilege. So my “help desk” mindset kicked in, and as she and i have discussed my chronic pain issues before, i decided to try to make sense of these concepts to her in terms i was personally familiar with. In trying to help her understand these issues, i started internally exploring the similarities and dissimilarities.

As coincidence would have it, the bus i took this evening stopped to pick up a man in a wheelchair. He paid his fare like everyone else on the bus did, and the driver scooted people out of the handicapped seats so that he could raise them up to make room for the man. It took several minutes to get him situated, and i could hear the discontented rumblings of the other passengers over the music from my headphones. As it so happened, he was getting off at the same stop as i was - less than half a mile away. I could hear more rumblings and exasperated sighs as i was getting off the bus. If i could hear this over my headphones, i know he had to have heard it quite plainly. For context: this area is not wheelchair-friendly. One side of the street has no sidewalks, and the sidewalks that are there exist in varying states of disrepair. Not all of the curbs are ramped. The street is a busy two-lane stretch that is quite hilly, and has limited visibility. That half-mile would have taken him the better part of an hour to navigate, and would involve several points where he would have to go on the side of the road and risk getting hit by a (usually speeding) passing car.

I told Ben about this when i got home, and he smiled as if he knew a great secret, prompting me to ask him what on earth he was smiling about. Turns out that Ben had seen him on the sidewalk just yesterday. The guy was moving his wheelchair repeatedly back and forth in the same spot. Ben went to go see if he was okay, or if he needed help, and it turns out that he was trying to re-seat a water meter cover that had come loose. I know that exact spot, too: the sidewalk is narrow, and in the dark mornings when i’m walking to the bus stop, i’ve nearly tripped on a coverless hole in the pavement. He went through no small amount of effort to make sure other people were able to walk safely over that spot.

But in all of this post, i am not talking about race, and i am not talking about disability. At times, there may be similar themes existing between the two, but the experiences are very different - they are each their own thing. Race is not a disability, and disability is not a racial issue. Experiencing one does not mean i am capable of understanding the full and repeated impact of the other.

Above all else, what these two things have in common (and what i am really talking about here) are uncommunicated and uncommunicative assumptions. Uncommunicable experiences come with that, because the way these assumptions operate, they shut out communication. There is an unstated assumption that someone in a wheelchair must have problems with spoken language. Unless you can get someone can state outright why they have that particular belief, it’s almost impossible to make progress in dispelling it. Talking about these issues makes people incredibly uncomfortable: it’s hard to discuss them without acknowledging our own ignorance, and we often feel compelled to express that our ignorances are not intentional ones. Ignorance is seen as a weakness, as a fault, and people in general have difficulty admitting either of those traits. Our eagerness to evade responsibility for our ignorance can compound the problems.

We are do not all experience the same levels or types of pain. We do not all have equal levels of pain tolerance. I can handle more physical pain than a lot of people i know (and i know some extreme people). But that doesn’t mean i like it, or welcome it in my life. That being said, i have learned many things from my experiences with being invisibly ill. Some of them have been valuable lessons, but sometimes i had to learn them in ways that no human being would want to go through, and in a just world, would not have to go through. I know people who have been through experiences similar to my own, and they have not come to the same conclusions, or learned the same lessons. Some of these folks are far more angry or bitter (and rightfully so) - not only about what they have had to deal with, but also with the way other people have treated them and reacted towards them.

They are entitled to this anger, and it is a just bitterness. These are right and valid responses. Given that, why should anyone let go of them? Navigating through “shoulds” is difficult, as we must provide our own maps, charts and instruments. Instead, let’s ask: why would someone let go of this? There we have the cost of bitterness, and the positive message, effects and precidence in letting it go, and the personal tools and strength gained in the process. How and when a person decides to let go of their anger and bitterness is not for anyone else to decide, nor does anyone else have the right to tell them when or how to go about doing it.

If you’ve made it this far in the post, i thank you for your patience. It’s a huge post, but these are huge issues. I’ve previously kept silent on a number of them because i haven’t felt “qualified” to discuss them; i recognize that much of that was fear of making an ass of myself, and fear of acknowledging and accepting my own limitations in discussing these matters. Sometimes it is necessary to just shut up and listen, but that inaction cannot be indefinitely maintained if one hopes to learn and grow - as an individual, but also as part of a community.

Okay, NOW i’ll say it

Thank God. Thank Goddess. Thank every living person out there. Thank those no longer with us who helped bring us to this day, this moment, this possibility.

Voteybits and faux pas.

Am i imagining things, or was there once a time when a person’s vote was their own business?

I know that probably comes off a bit snippy, but don’t get me wrong: if you want to go telling everyone who your favorite candidate is,  that’s totally kosher. But saying who you actually voted for? I dunno, it just… gnah. The people who know me will be able to make a good guess, but unless it’s someone i trust, i’m not going to confirm or deny who they think i voted for.

I’m not sure why i’m so secretive about this. I just know that i’ve been seeing people post on their blogs and LJs saying “i voted for _________!” - and there’s a part of me that just wonders how they can so easily post or say these things.

Yesterday, i was walking downtown. A man stopped me to ask me something. I had my earbuds in, so i had no idea what he’d said. i took one of the earbuds out of my ear to ask him what he’d said. Long story short, he asked me who i was voting for.

Excuse me?

I said, “I live in _____ County - who do you think i’m voting for?” He responded that he didn’t know, and i said, “It’s just as well, because it’s none of your business anyway.”

Maybe this is just something that falls into the category of “weird crap my mom did when i was young”. She was incredibly secretive about these sorts of things (votes, bills, her stuff, her room, etc), and even asking could land you in a world of hurt. Given how backasswards some of the things i’ve learned from her have turned out to be (i thought “legs” was a swear word - don’t ask, i don’t remember how or why), i wouldn’t be surprised if this was another one of those things.

Then again, i’m similarly close-mouthed about some of the finer points of my beliefs. But still. I find it hard to let go of this one. Who i vote for is my business. I don’t have to tell you, i don’t have to tell anyone or anything except the bits in the voting booth. It’s not as bad as my mom was about it: i’ll easily tell anyone i’m related to, be it by blood or marriage. But i haven’t said it out loud to friends i’ve known for over a decade - and i don’t plan on it.

Yeah, i can see that in a lot of ways, this is very silly of me… because for anyone who knows me, or for anyone who’s been paying attention, it should be obvious who i’d vote for.

Building character: actions and reactions

I am frequently heard saying, “It’s good to want things: it builds character when you don’t get them.” I think i’ve even said i here before. But i haven’t really thought too much about it in a long time. This is not uncommon: when ideas become repeated often enough, we can lose sight of the original intent behind it.

Well, i said that line to someone earlier today, and followed it up with “… Just like shoveling the sidewalk.” And as i went about what i was doing, i started thinking about it. Living in the south-eastern US, i imagine children here are not familiar with the following scenario:

Parent: Kid, go shovel the (snow off of the) sidewalk.

Kid: Awwww, i don’t wanna shovel the sidewalk. Why do i have to do it?

Parent: Because shoveling snow builds character.

When i was growing up, anything we didn’t want to do - but had to do anyway - was something that “builds character”. At some point i decided i must be the most character-y character that was ever characterized, and so the phrase “builds character” became a favorite joke of mine.

So i’ve thought about it. Why are these things supposed to “build character”, and what does that even mean, anyway? Well, i imagine it teaches kids how to deal with things that they don’t want to do, but have to do anyway. The way our parents react to our Not Wanting To Mow The Lawn (to use a perhaps more common example) instructs us on which of our reactions are or are not acceptable. Some kids may try to whine their way out of it; if their parents relent, the child learns that whining will give them what they want - or rather, it will get them out of what they do not want to do. Some kids will try to pass it off onto their older or younger siblings; if the siblings give in (for whatever reason) and the parents do not intervene, the child will learn that they can get other people to do their work, and with little to no consequences.

At what point does it (”it” being “the way we react to things we don’t want to do”) stop building character, and start displaying character? At what point do we stop taking note of how the people around us react to our reactions?

Let’s take a random fat person. We’ll call her Babushka. Babushka is fat, but wants to be thin (to keep things simple, we do not know the reason why she wants to lose weight). She tries every diet out there, no matter how sensible or surreal it might be. Sometimes she loses weight, sometimes she doesn’t. Sometimes the lost weight comes back quickly, sometimes it comes back slowly - but it always comes back. This may not be the end result for every fat person, but it has been Babushka’s personal experience with weight loss attempts. Eventually, she can come to the following conclusions:

  1. If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.
  2. Doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is a functional definition of insanity.

Which one is correct? Or rather, which one is more correct? And how do we know the difference - not just for Babushka, but for each and every fat person out there? Maybe #1 is right for Babushka, but her best friend (who, for our purposes, has also tried to lose weight) feels more in line with #2. Who’s to say which of these individuals is right and which is wrong? Maybe it’s possible that there’s more than one right answer, or that in some ways, they are both right? Or are they both wrong?

Babushka is repeatedly not getting what she wants. How is that any less character-building than having to mow the lawn? It is a social expectation to have one’s lawn mowed regularly, because no matter how much you mow it, it keeps growing back. Attempting to lose weight is also a societal expectation. In terms of what is acceptable in the performance of one’s duties, it doesn’t matter if she does lose the weight, because the expectation is that she tries, regardless of feedback, regardless of failure. To go back to her possible conclusions, society demands that Babushka try, try again - and that she should be insane.

Some people might say that opinions cannot be right or wrong, that they are entirely subjective - that it is how one acts (and reacts) to those opinions (or to opposing opinions) that can be characterized as right or wrong. While that may be the case for a fair number of things, does it still hold true for opinions that we feel are morally reprehensible? If someone feels that homosexuality is morally wrong, is it okay for them to feel this way, so long as they do not perform any negative actions towards gay individuals or the gay community? Is it okay for someone to have racist opinions, so long as they do not discriminate against other races or attempt to cause harm to people of other races?

There are some folks who very strongly believe that it is wrong to think or feel a certain way about some things, regardless of whether or not you intentionally act on those thoughts and feelings. As much as i am inclined to think that people are allowed to have their own opinions, i also agree with the idea that some opinions are incredibly toxic. And that, again, is an opinion.

But we’re going to stop that branch of this conversational tree, because i think that aspect of this topic is worthy of it’s own post (or hell, an entire range of blogs and books). Also: i don’t know if i’m the best-equipped person to adequately address these particular issues. So let’s go back to some other examples of what i was discussing earlier.

Devochka is a member of the Fat Acceptance community. She believes that you cannot be a part of the FA community if you think it’s okay to want to lose weight (we’ll not go into Why, that’s a whole other book unto itself).

Malchik is also a member of the FA community. He believes that the primary statement of FA is that “it is unconscionable to discriminate against someone because of their size.” He feels that the FA community needs to be more inclusive towards people who are attempting (or might attempt) to lose weight (again, not going into Why).

Now, since there isn’t any one person who has the ultimate say-so on who can and who cannot be a part of the FA community, neither person can get what they want. One person wants to be more exclusive, the other wants to be more inclusive. While we haven’t gone into the Why of each side, they both have valid reasons and justifications to back up their opinions. They both might feel that the other is wrong, and be able to come up with equally valid reasons as to why, but again, given the same amount of time and brainpower, both sides are both capable of proving the other wrong. So are they both right or both wrong? Either way, they cannot be a part of the same community and both get what they want. But they both want to be a part of the community.

This is where we come back to character. Not getting what we want has potential to “build character”. I think the difference between building and displaying character is how willing or resistant (respectively) we are to the idea of change. (And yes, that does work both ways between our friends Devotchka and Malchik.)

If you really want to complicate things, there are times when changing your mind is not a form of growth, but rather a form of giving in (or worse, giving up). This can be incredibly subjective, with some folks having strong opinions on either side (and some people being indifferent on the matter).

This is not some wishy-washy “everyone must find their own path” dealio. I know it might sound like that’s where i’m going with this, but much of the time i don’t agree with the idea that “everyone must find their own path”. When you start defining what those paths might be, you come up with some pretty ridiculous statements. My personal favorite example here is “everyone must find their own path to heart surgery.” Pretty goofy, neh? But on the other hand, i also do not agree with the idea of there being One True Path.

You are welcome to disagree with me (on this or any other topic). Our opinions do not have to match. What matters is the actions that you and i take in regards to our differences of opinion. If you think fat people are ugly? That’s totally your prerogative to have that opinion. If you want to put up a website talking about how ugly fat people are? I think you’ll make yourself look like an ass for devoting so much time and energy talking about something you proclaim to hate, but hey: it’s your time and energy you’re wasting, not mine.

A brief but very important tangent on that last bit: there comes a point when that sort of project has gone beyond “voicing your opinion”, and has actively become a form of promoting hatred/discrimination. I do not agree with the idea that we bear NO responsibility for how people react to us. While we do not bear ALL of the responsibility, we are responsible for making sure that we say what we want to say in a responsible fashion. What exactly defines the demarcation between “voicing opinion” and “promoting hatred”? Is that something so easily determined, or rather: how subjective is the demarcation between these two things?

Now, if you think you’re entitled to tell every fat person out there how ugly you think they are? Here’s where it gets interesting: the minute you think you’re entitled to something, you’ve already lost. At that point, how i react has become irrelevant, because how you interpret my reaction is no longer an unbiased view of my character. You expected a certain reaction from me, and how you react to my reaction is based, not on Me As An Individual, but whether or not i gave you the reaction you wanted.